Skip to main content

Welcome back to the (new) Capital Region Caveman

Welcome! And maybe welcome back. 

First, I haven't actually worked out the scheme/layout of the blog yet. I wanted to get it up and rolling while I work on making it visually appealing. I'll be posting some of the old archived post from old site dating back to 2013. There was some good information on the old site. Of course, I'll be adding new content. 

Second, while I truly believe Paleo and Paleo lifestyle and all that entails -sans the evil grips of commercial marketing- is the most responsible and honest lifestyle you can follow, because it was and is performance based, preaches personal responsibility and doesn't promise quick fixes. It's truly a lifestyle change vs a diet. This site, the Facebook page and the Twitter aren't exclusively Paleo. By that I mean, we don't follow Dr Cordains (diet) or any other Paleo gurus principles to a T. If you want to eat legumes, go for it. Milk/dairy, have at it. You like grains, have at it (though, I believe you should avoid modern grains, especially wheat, and stick to "ancient" grains, but...). The truth  is, the Paleolithic man ate a diverse range of foods depending on where on the globe he was and that included bugs, worms, lizards, carrion (which probably was a bigger aspect of the gatherer than him being a great hunter), fruits, vegetables, maybe legumes (though highly debatable before cooking, they have been found in teeth, hopefully not his last meal). He ate keto, he ate higher protein (carnivore), he ate moderate to higher carb (though, most primal. diets were definitely low carb by today's standards, even the high carb ones). There unfortunately were no vegan caveman. He didn't always have the luxury of deciding what foods he couldn't eat. As far as dairy, we are mammals. NOTHING is more natural than drinking milk. It's literally what makes us mammals. Modern hunter gatherers often breast fed their offspring to 3-5 years of age. If the caveman could have milked a woolly mammoth he would have. Obviously you know what's best for you and if you don't, experiment. Self experimenting and figuring things out for yourself is probably what led you to this site. Everyone is different. Biology and physiology are not like the other sciences. They have paradoxical examples for nearly every situation. You very well might be that outlier. 

The whole, "if you have this, we have a pill for that solution isn't working." It's neither cost effective, nor is it leading to a satisfactory health span. And the dietary and movement/exercise guidelines aren't either. So I'm tossing around  evidence based  ideas of why maybe things aren't working even though we keep stuffing a square peg in a round hole. What  I'm not, I'm not an anti-vaxxer, anti western medicine, anti pharmaceutical conspiracy theorist. I am someone who thinks we have significantly more control over our health span and that the last line of defense shouldn't be the first line. Really all you have control over is your health; at least to a large degree, maybe more than anything else in your life. 

Twitter @CRCaveman

Follow along. Do your own research. Self experiment. Form your own opinions. Find what works, toss what doesn't. 


Popular posts from this blog

Visceral Fat is not Subcutaneous Fat

Hmm... No. Both the photo and title are misleading. Visceral fat isn't the same as subcutaneous fat, which while not pretty, is relatively harmless provided it isn't excessive. Visceral fat on the other hand is fairly dangerous as it surrounds your organs and is a sign of metabolic disease and insulin resistance. The reseason visceral fat may be so dangerous vs subcutaneous fat is a regulartory molecule called TRIP-Br2. TRIP-Br2 is not found in subcutaneous adipose tissue. Oddly enough, TRIP-Br2 appears to block or prevent normal lipolysis. So, if you have lots of visceral fat, you might not be able to lose weight normally. This may explain why many people struggle with the viscous cycle of failure. Insulin resistance, inability to lose fat, and so on, are all tied together. This may also be why diets like keto (insignificant carb), carnivore (0 carb), low carb (<20% of your calories from quality carbs) work for people when the standard diets don't, even thou

Covid-19 Revelations: We Don't Need Gyms, We Never Did!

Insider I'm not sure how everyone else is doing during Covid-19, the lockdown and gyms being closed, but I'm personally down 12+lbs. True, some of that is muscle since I can't lift, but a lot of it was excess fat. The fact is, gyms are not always utilized correctly, and people can do better by getting proper exercise in the real world. The best use of a gym is inclement weather, week nights during the winter, or short duration high intensity weight training. Spending your weekends and even your summer week nights at the gym is a terrible way to get exercise. Walking (walking briskly or with a weighted pack if you feel walking is too easy, is still one of the absolute best forms of exercise in terms of risk vs benefits), hiking (even better than walking, introduces instability and elevation and usually involves that weighted pack), biking (mountain, road, gravel, even indoors - if you must), swimming (you don't need a pool to swim, open water is fun and free)

Muscle Mass and Cardiovascular Health, It's More Than Aerobic Exercise

The heart is the most important muscle in the body, and more than a half century after Dr. Kenneth Cooper's recommendations to train the heart via aerobic exercise -aka cardio- there continues to be evidence that this is not the most beneficial way to improve heart health or healthspan. This study looks at the benefits of increasing skeletal muscle mass specifically on heart health.  The study found participants in the highest skeletal muscle mass tertile (the people with the most lean muscle mass) had 81% (HR=0.85) lower risk for a CVD event (heart attack) as compared with those in the lowest SMM tertile.  One way to look at it, despite all the extra time spent running, it is sprinters who likely have healthier hearts than distance runners when muscle mass is factored in.  So even if you enjoy running for the pure joy of it, consider rebalancing a little more time to the weight room, your heart will appreciate it.